N-of-1 trial
Why this level?
The design family and its defining features have not been specified for this hierarchy. NHMRC 2009 sourceThe unit is one patient, and the hierarchy rates what a design can support for a population. A randomised multiple-crossover in one person can be strong evidence for that person and says nothing on its own about anyone else -- a distinction the ladder does not make.
What question does this help answer?
It answers "does this treatment work for THIS person", which is often the question in front of a clinician and is not the question a parallel-group trial answers.
When to use it
Use it for a chronic stable condition, a treatment with rapid onset and offset, and an outcome that can be measured repeatedly and reverses. It is well suited to deciding whether to continue a medication whose benefit for an individual is genuinely unclear.
When not to use it
It cannot be used for conditions that progress, for outcomes that occur once, or for treatments that cure or permanently modify disease. It also cannot, on its own, answer a population question.
How it works in plain language
The patient receives treatment and comparator in multiple randomized, blinded pairs of periods, with washouts between. Outcomes are recorded in each period and compared within the patient. Repeating the pairs is what distinguishes signal from day-to-day fluctuation.
What the treatment periods look like
Why Mallard may recommend it
Mallard may recommend an N-of-1 design when the question is explicitly about an individual patient's response and the condition and treatment meet the stability and reversibility requirements.
Key assumptions and design requirements
- The condition is stable over the trial and the treatment effect reverses on withdrawal.
- Periods are randomized and, where possible, blinded to patient and assessor.
- Enough pairs of periods are run to distinguish effect from variability.
- The outcome is measured repeatedly with an instrument sensitive enough for within-person change.
- Aggregating a SERIES of N-of-1 trials is the route to a population estimate, and needs its own analysis plan.
What to watch out for
The answer applies to the patient studied, and generalizing it requires aggregating a series of such trials. It needs a condition that is stable, an outcome that responds quickly and reverses, and a treatment with a short washout: most questions do not meet all three.
Clinical example
Question: Does this patient's chronic pain actually respond to the drug they have been taking for a year? Design: Four randomized blinded pairs of two-week periods on drug and placebo with washouts, with daily pain scores, compared within the patient.
How to report it
CENT, the CONSORT extension for N-of-1 trials, is the guideline for this design. Report the number and length of treatment periods, how the order of treatments was randomised and whether it was blinded, any washout between periods, and how the analysis handled carryover and the repeated measurements within the one patient. A reporting guideline is not a design manual: use it to make the study transparent, not as a substitute for careful design. Check the target journal's own requirements as well, which this page cannot know.
- CONSORT extension for reporting N-of-1 trials (CENT) 2015 Statement (opens in a new tab) · BMJ · doi 10.1136/bmj.h1738
- Overview of clinical study designs (opens in a new tab) · Clin Exp Emerg Med · doi 10.15441/ceem.23.036